000 03513cam a22005054a 4500
001 muse51549
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20161111135850.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 151021s2016 mdu o 00 0 eng d
010 _z 2015014321
020 _a9781421418711
020 _a1421418711
020 _z9781421418704 (hardcover : alkaline paper)
020 _z1421418703 (hardcover : alkaline paper)
035 _a(OCoLC)935326614
040 _aMdBmJHUP
_cMdBmJHUP
043 _an-us---
050 0 0 _aE302.1
_b.S36 2016
082 0 0 _a303.3/80973
_223
100 1 _aSchmeller, Mark G.,
_d1967-
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aInvisible sovereign
_h[electronic resource] :
_bimagining public opinion from the revolution to reconstruction /
_cMark G. Schmeller.
260 _aBaltimore, MD :
_bJohns Hopkins University Press,
_c[2016]
_e(Baltimore, Md. :
_fProject MUSE,
_g2015)
300 _a1 online resource (pages cm.)
336 _atext
_btxt
337 _acomputer
_bc
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
490 0 _aNew studies in american intellectual and cultural history
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 _aIntroduction : public opinion and the American political imagination -- The moral economy of opinion -- The political economy of opinion -- Partisan manufactories of public sentiment -- The importance of having opinion -- The fatal force of public opinion -- Irrepressible conflicts, impending crises -- Conclusion : corn-pone opinion -- Essay on sources.
520 _a"Even today, with sophisticated surveys and computer-produced margins of error, we have trouble gauging the elusive voice we call 'public opinion,' but no one questions its importance in a democracy. In this insightful new study, Mark G. Schmeller sets out to recreate or approximate the nature of public opinion between independence and the aftermath of Civil War and also examine what leading Americans thought about it. Where could one detect it? How might attitudes toward it, in the abstract and concrete, have changed in this eventful period? 'As Americans contested the meaning of this essentially contestable concept,' Schmeller explains, 'they expanded and contracted the horizons of political possibility and renegotiated the terms of political legitimacy.' He argues that what began life as something close to exceptionally American republican thought (and in a sense unchanging) became something far more malleable and subject to manipulation by means of stump-speech rhetoric, partisan newspapers, trumpeting of the importance of the self in the nineteenth century, etc. Crossing into so many discrete fields of historical research, this project has much potential as a synthesizing meta-narrative"--
_cProvided by publisher.
588 _aDescription based on print version record.
651 0 _aUnited States
_xPolitics and government
_y1865-1877.
651 0 _aUnited States
_xPolitics and government
_y1783-1865.
651 0 _aUnited States
_xPolitics and government
_y1775-1783.
650 0 _aPublic opinion
_zUnited States
_xHistory
_y19th century.
650 0 _aPublic opinion
_zUnited States
_xHistory
_y18th century.
655 7 _aElectronic books.
_2local
710 2 _aProject Muse.
830 0 _aUPCC book collections on Project MUSE.
856 4 0 _zFull text available:
_uhttps://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781421418711/
945 _aProject MUSE - UPCC 2016 History
945 _aProject MUSE - UPCC 2016 Complete
999 _c877
_d877