000 04633cam a22005174a 4500
001 muse52030
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20161111135900.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 160127s2016 ilu o 00 0 eng d
010 _z 2016004102
020 _a9780252098444
020 _a0252098447
020 _z9780252040221
035 _a(OCoLC)936205674
040 _aMdBmJHUP
_cMdBmJHUP
050 1 0 _aGV709
082 0 0 _a362.29/088796
_223
100 1 _aPieper, Lindsay Parks,
_d1985-
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aSex testing
_h[electronic resource] :
_bgender policing in women's sports /
_cLindsay Parks Pieper.
260 _aUrbana :
_bUniversity of Illinois Press,
_c2016.
_e(Baltimore, Md. :
_fProject MUSE,
_g2015)
300 _a1 online resource (1 online resource.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 0 _aSport and society
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520 _a"To assess the long-lasting significance of sex testing in sport, this book explores its history, from the 1930s to the early 2000s, with particular emphasis on the International Olympic Committee's mandated compulsory sex checks on all female competitors. In 1968 the Medical Commission implemented the first test of the modern Olympic Movement. The procedure intended to guarantee the authenticity of Olympic competitors and identify male masqueraders, as well as to scientifically confirm the separation of men and women in athletic competition. Although the Medical Commission never discovered a single male imposter, and the test illustrated the impossibility of determining the exact constitution of woman, the IOC maintained the policy for three decades. With both the impossibility of discovering a clear sex divide and the increased presence of female dopers, the IOC adjusted its semantic framework to encapsulate gender normativity. The conspicuous adjustment from sex to gender underscored the Medical Commission's changing anxieties. Rather than to catch men disguised as women, the test evolved into a measure to preclude female Olympians with biological advantages. In other words, the Medical Commission eventually viewed gender verification as a tool to eliminate competitors it deemed too strong, too fast or too successful for women's competition. Olympic womanhood--dependent on a belief in natural, dichotomous sex/gender difference--required female athletes to conform to conventional notions of white, Western femininity. Through these regulations, the IOC has continuously reaffirmed a binary notion of sex, privileged white gender norms and hampered female athleticism"--
_cProvided by publisher.
520 _a"In 1968, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) implemented sex testing for female athletes at that year's Games. When it became clear that testing regimes failed to delineate a sex divide, the IOC began to test for gender --a shift that allowed the organization to control the very idea of womanhood. Lindsay Parks Pieper explores sex testing in sport from the 1930s to the early 2000s. Focusing on assumptions and goals as well as means, Pieper examines how the IOC in particular insisted on a misguided binary notion of gender that privileged Western norms. Testing evolved into a tool to identify--and eliminate--athletes the IOC deemed too strong, too fast, or too successful. Pieper shows how this system punished gifted women while hindering the development of women's athletics for decades. She also reveals how the flawed notions behind testing--ideas often sexist, racist, or ridiculous--degraded the very idea of female athleticism"--
_cProvided by publisher.
588 _aDescription based on print version record.
650 7 _aSPORTS & RECREATION / Olympics.
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aSOCIAL SCIENCE / Women's Studies.
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aSOCIAL SCIENCE / Gender Studies.
_2bisacsh
650 0 _aSports
_xSex differences.
650 0 _aSex discrimination in sports.
650 0 _aWomen athletes
_xPhysiology.
610 2 0 _aIOC Medical Commission.
655 7 _aElectronic books.
_2local
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_aPieper, Lindsay Parks, 1985- author.
_tSex testing
_dUrbana : University of Illinois Press, 2016
_z9780252040221
_w(DLC) 2015042892
710 2 _aProject Muse.
830 0 _aUPCC book collections on Project MUSE.
856 4 0 _zFull text available:
_uhttps://muse.jhu.edu/book/45686/
945 _aProject MUSE - UPCC 2016 Global Cultural Studies
945 _aProject MUSE - UPCC 2016 Complete
999 _c1418
_d1418